Top Reasons Why No One Should Want to Play USC in 2008 - Part 1 - REVENGE

Top Reasons Why No One Should want to play USC in 2008

REVENGE
In 2006 and 2007, USC was left out of the National Championship for losing two games (each season) that they should not have. -People might argue that Oregon was the exception. Well, if John David Booty was playing, and Brian Cushing wasn't sidelined, it would have been a whole different story.

The Trojans know that it was only their stupid mistakes that lost those games. When they are determined to win a game, they come as close to invincible as a college team can. The only caveat to that would be Vince Young. USC's got some demons to exercise in 2008, and frankly, I'm a little frightened for those who have to line up against them. For example, USC had a couple teams to get some revenge on in 2007: Oregon State and UCLA. The Trojans did a nice job beating up on both.

This 2008 season, the whole NCAAF should be shakin' in there spikes. And no SEC, you're no exception. Bring on Stafford and Moreno, or Tebow (he'd have a better chance). I don't think I need to remind you about Arkansas and highly touted McFadden, but I will anyway- 70-17 in the Colosseum, then 50-14 in Arkansas. Don't get me wrong though...I completely agree that the SEC is probably the toughest conference to play in. I will also agree that the PAC-10 is not the hardest (though it is tougher than most of the -ahem...- BCS conferences.



USC is just a dominant force. Even more disconcerting, now they're a dominant force with something to prove. Look out... Everybody! This article might ruffle a few feathers, but just be happy you're not getting your bell rung by a legion of ticked-off Trojans.